Plain "BTC per share" counts every coin a company holds as if it all belonged to you. It doesn't — debt and preferred stock sit ahead of common stock in line. CEBE answers the sharper question: what's actually left once they're paid? Click any column to sort.
Updated 2026-10-14 18:27 UTC · BTC $81,510 ·25 companies priced
| # | Company | Price | mNAV | Claims % | CEBE (BTC) | Sats/$100 ▼ | CEBE sats/sh | BTC held | Claims $ | Pref coverage | BTC stress (−20%/−50%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $0.16 | 0.04× ◆ | 10.3% | 2,600 BTC | 2,699,259 | 4,438 | 2,899 | $24 M | — | 2,621,650 / 2,388,821 | |
| 2 | HOGPF H100 Group · H100.ST · 🇸🇪 | $0.21 | 0.25× ◆ | 8.0% | 3,224 BTC | 451,343 | 953 | 3,506 | $23 M | — | 441,468 / 411,843 |
| 3 | ZOOZ ZOOZ Strategy · 🇺🇸 | $6.40 | 0.61× ◆ | 0.0% | 1,046 BTC | 201,747 | 12,912 | 1,046 | $0 M | — | 201,747 / 201,747 |
| 4 | $1.66 | 0.61× ◆ | 4.3% | 41,145 BTC | 193,642 | 3,214 | 43,000 | $151 M | n/a | 191,459 / 184,912 | |
| 5 | XXI Twenty One Capital · 🇺🇸 | $5.96 | 0.58× ◆ | 13.7% | 37,545 BTC | 181,491 | 10,826 | 43,514 | $486 M | — | 174,278 / 152,639 |
| 6 | KULR KULR Technology · 🇺🇸 | $1.98 | 1.03× | 0.0% | 1,083 BTC | 118,489 | 2,340 | 1,083 | $0 M | — | 118,489 / 118,489 |
| 7 | TSWCF The Smarter Web Company · SWC.L · 🇬🇧 | $0.67 | 1.11× | 0.0% | 2,747 BTC | 110,224 | 739 | 2,747 | $0 M | — | 110,224 / 110,224 |
| 8 | $0.26 | 1.17× | 0.0% | 1,862 BTC | 105,239 | 270 | 1,862 | $0 M | — | 105,239 / 105,239 | |
| 9 | $142.86 | 0.81× ◆ | 34.4% | 554,754 BTC | 99,924 | 142,751 | 845,050 | $23.7 B | -0.012× | 86,851 / 47,635 | |
| 10 | FUFU BitFuFu · 🇸🇬 | $1.25 | 1.36× | 0.0% | 1,855 BTC | 90,134 | 1,124 | 1,855 | $0 M | — | 90,134 / 90,134 |
| 11 | $24.79 | 1.18× | 50.0% | 12,268 BTC | 52,140 | 12,923 | 24,531 | $1,000 M | n/a | 39,110 / 23 | |
| 12 | $30.18 | 2.45× | 0.0% | 24,400 BTC | 50,160 | 15,136 | 24,400 | $0 M | — | 50,160 / 50,160 | |
| 13 | $9.04 | 2.39× | 59.2% | 5,496 BTC | 20,951 | 1,895 | 13,470 | $650 M | — | 13,351 / -9,451 | |
| 14 | $8.24 | 0.97× ◆ | 84.5% | 5,632 BTC | 19,528 | 1,609 | 36,303 | $2.5 B | — | -7,059 / -86,821 | |
| 15 | CPTLF Capital B (fmr. The Blockchain Group) · ALCPB.PA · 🇫🇷 | $6.58 | 7.72× | 0.0% | 3,145 BTC | 15,898 | 1,046 | 3,145 | $0 M | — | 15,898 / 15,898 |
| 16 | $14.96 | 4.21× | 46.9% | 8,319 BTC | 15,452 | 2,311 | 15,680 | $600 M | — | 12,034 / 1,779 | |
| 17 | ABTC American Bitcoin · 🇺🇸 | $7.67 | 13.71× | 0.0% | 7,300 BTC | 8,948 | 687 | 7,300 | $0 M | — | 8,948 / 8,948 |
| 18 | $73.58 | 9.66× | 35.8% | 6,597 BTC | 8,151 | 5,998 | 10,278 | $300 M | — | 7,014 / 3,604 | |
| 19 | CANG Cango Inc · 🇨🇳 | $3.83 | 8.65× | 45.2% | 583 BTC | 7,771 | 298 | 1,065 | $39 M | — | 6,167 / 1,354 |
| 20 | VIDA Vida Global Inc. · 🇺🇸 | $1.21 | 18.12× | 0.0% | 12 BTC | 6,770 | 82 | 11.69 | $0 M | — | 6,770 / 6,770 |
| 21 | CIFR Cipher Digital (fmr. Cipher Mining) · 🇺🇸 | $9.86 | 32.97× | 0.0% | 1,500 BTC | 3,721 | 367 | 1,500 | $0 M | — | 3,721 / 3,721 |
| 22 | $172.01 | 36.04× | 0.0% | 15,389 BTC | 3,404 | 5,855 | 15,389 | $0 M | — | 3,404 / 3,404 | |
| 23 | $74.95 | 60.59× | 0.0% | 9,032 BTC | 2,025 | 1,518 | 9,032 | $0 M | — | 2,025 / 2,025 | |
| 24 | $364.24 | 1246.36× | 0.0% | 11,509 BTC | 98 | 359 | 11,509 | $0 M | — | 98 / 98 | |
| 25 | DJT Trump Media & Technology · 🇺🇸 | $7.25 | 2.58× | 124.7% | -2,358 BTC | -11,735 | -851 | 9,542 | $970 M | — | -26,539 / -70,952 |
Claims = Debt + Preferred stock liquidation preference − Cash on hand (cash can pay those claims down before the BTC is ever touched, so it nets against them — matches cebetracker.io's own published formula). CEBE (BTC) = (BTC held × BTC price − Claims) ÷ BTC price — what's actually left for a COMMON shareholder once debt and preferred stock are paid. Sats/$100 is the number to actually compare across tickers: sats of real common-equity BTC exposure per $100 spent on the STOCK, after every senior claim is netted out.
This is a liquidation-waterfall stress test, not a going-concern figure — it assumes every claim is paid TODAY. In practice a company services its preferred dividends and debt coupons as a going concern and the BTC just compounds; low CEBE coverage is a solvency-stress signal, not evidence the stock is mispriced right now. Debt, preferred, and cash figures are curated approximations refreshed periodically from filings. 1 company from the same curated list were checked and left off this run because yfinance could not price it, or the most recent quote was too old to trust — a company disappearing from here is a data gap, not a claim it stopped holding Bitcoin. Nothing here is investment advice.
Everything above this point is a liquidation snapshot — what would be left if every claim were paid off TODAY. That's the wrong lens for a question that actually matters day to day: can the company keep paying its preferred dividend out of its own business, or is it funding that dividend some other way? Annual dividend obligation = preferred liquidation preference × blended dividend rate. Coverage = operating cash flow (core business, trailing twelve months) ÷ that obligation. Above 1× means operations cover the bill; below 1× — and especially negative, like MSTR today — means the dividend is being funded some other way entirely: a capital raise, asset sales, a dedicated cash reserve, not the business itself.
A blank here means one of two different things, kept separate on purpose: a dash (—) means the company has no preferred stock at all, so there's nothing to cover. "n/a" means real preferred stock exists but the company's own disclosures don't isolate core-business cash flow cleanly enough to compute this honestly (Metaplanet today, whose consolidated cash flow is swamped by its Bitcoin Income Business) — that's a data gap, not a zero, and we'd rather show the gap than force a number into it.
Shows what Sats/$100 would read if BTC fell 20% or 50% from today, holding the stock price and every claim (debt, preferred, cash) exactly where they are. It deliberately does NOT also drop the stock price in proportion — if it did, a company whose whole balance sheet is BTC would show an artificially stable ratio (both sides of the fraction shrinking together), which would hide the exact risk this exists to expose: fixed-dollar claims eating a growing share of a shrinking BTC pile. This is why a heavily preferred- or debt-funded name's stress numbers fall off faster than a debt-free one's — the claims don't shrink when BTC does, so they consume a bigger bite of a smaller pie. A negative −50% reading is a real signal: common's claimed BTC backing would be gone at that price, even though the company still legally owns every coin. Not a prediction of what BTC will do, and not a claim the stock price would actually hold still — a pure "how much of the cushion is claims-related" isolation test.
← All Bitcoin Treasuries categories