Plain "BTC per share" counts every coin a company holds as if it all belonged to you. It doesn't — debt and preferred stock sit ahead of common stock in line. CEBE answers the sharper question: what's actually left once they're paid? Click any column to sort.
Updated 2026-10-14 13:31 UTC · BTC $82,721 ·25 companies priced
| # | Company | Price | mNAV | Claims % | CEBE (BTC) | Sats/$100 ▼ | CEBE sats/sh | BTC held | Claims $ | Pref coverage | BTC stress (−20%/−50%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $0.17 | 0.04× ◆ | 10.2% | 2,604 BTC | 2,540,030 | 4,445 | 2,899 | $24 M | — | 2,468,189 / 2,252,664 | |
| 2 | HOGPF H100 Group · H100.ST · 🇸🇪 | $0.21 | 0.25× ◆ | 7.9% | 3,228 BTC | 451,921 | 954 | 3,506 | $23 M | — | 442,191 / 413,000 |
| 3 | $1.64 | 0.59× ◆ | 4.3% | 41,172 BTC | 196,133 | 3,217 | 43,000 | $151 M | n/a | 193,956 / 187,425 | |
| 4 | ZOOZ ZOOZ Strategy · 🇺🇸 | $6.68 | 0.62× ◆ | 0.0% | 1,046 BTC | 193,290 | 12,912 | 1,046 | $0 M | — | 193,290 / 193,290 |
| 5 | XXI Twenty One Capital · 🇺🇸 | $6.29 | 0.61× ◆ | 13.5% | 37,633 BTC | 172,377 | 10,851 | 43,514 | $486 M | — | 165,642 / 145,438 |
| 6 | KULR KULR Technology · 🇺🇸 | $2.05 | 1.06× | 0.0% | 1,083 BTC | 114,154 | 2,340 | 1,083 | $0 M | — | 114,154 / 114,154 |
| 7 | TSWCF The Smarter Web Company · SWC.L · 🇬🇧 | $0.72 | 1.18× | 0.0% | 2,747 BTC | 102,855 | 739 | 2,747 | $0 M | — | 102,855 / 102,855 |
| 8 | $0.26 | 1.19× | 0.0% | 1,862 BTC | 102,053 | 270 | 1,862 | $0 M | — | 102,053 / 102,053 | |
| 9 | $149.12 | 0.83× ◆ | 33.8% | 559,003 BTC | 96,462 | 143,844 | 845,050 | $23.7 B | -0.012× | 84,122 / 47,102 | |
| 10 | FUFU BitFuFu · 🇸🇬 | $1.34 | 1.44× | 0.0% | 1,855 BTC | 83,899 | 1,124 | 1,855 | $0 M | — | 83,899 / 83,899 |
| 11 | $25.93 | 1.21× | 49.3% | 12,448 BTC | 50,566 | 13,112 | 24,531 | $1,000 M | n/a | 38,295 / 1,480 | |
| 12 | $31.41 | 2.51× | 0.0% | 24,400 BTC | 48,188 | 15,136 | 24,400 | $0 M | — | 48,188 / 48,188 | |
| 13 | $9.77 | 2.54× | 58.3% | 5,612 BTC | 19,808 | 1,935 | 13,470 | $650 M | — | 12,875 / -7,925 | |
| 14 | $8.80 | 1.03× | 83.2% | 6,081 BTC | 19,743 | 1,737 | 36,303 | $2.5 B | — | -4,788 / -78,380 | |
| 15 | CPTLF Capital B (fmr. The Blockchain Group) · ALCPB.PA · 🇫🇷 | $6.58 | 7.60× | 0.0% | 3,145 BTC | 15,898 | 1,046 | 3,145 | $0 M | — | 15,898 / 15,898 |
| 16 | $16.09 | 4.47× | 46.3% | 8,427 BTC | 14,548 | 2,341 | 15,680 | $600 M | — | 11,417 / 2,026 | |
| 17 | CANG Cango Inc · 🇨🇳 | $3.50 | 7.79× | 44.6% | 590 BTC | 8,606 | 301 | 1,065 | $39 M | — | 6,877 / 1,688 |
| 18 | ABTC American Bitcoin · 🇺🇸 | $8.36 | 14.72× | 0.0% | 7,300 BTC | 8,214 | 687 | 7,300 | $0 M | — | 8,214 / 8,214 |
| 19 | $80.55 | 10.42× | 35.3% | 6,651 BTC | 7,507 | 6,047 | 10,278 | $300 M | — | 6,484 / 3,414 | |
| 20 | VIDA Vida Global Inc. · 🇺🇸 | $1.13 | 16.61× | 0.0% | 12 BTC | 7,276 | 82 | 11.69 | $0 M | — | 7,276 / 7,276 |
| 21 | CIFR Cipher Digital (fmr. Cipher Mining) · 🇺🇸 | $10.65 | 35.12× | 0.0% | 1,500 BTC | 3,442 | 367 | 1,500 | $0 M | — | 3,442 / 3,442 |
| 22 | $178.13 | 36.78× | 0.0% | 15,389 BTC | 3,287 | 5,855 | 15,389 | $0 M | — | 3,287 / 3,287 | |
| 23 | $75.50 | 60.14× | 0.0% | 9,032 BTC | 2,010 | 1,518 | 9,032 | $0 M | — | 2,010 / 2,010 | |
| 24 | $368.95 | 1244.00× | 0.0% | 11,509 BTC | 97 | 359 | 11,509 | $0 M | — | 97 / 97 | |
| 25 | DJT Trump Media & Technology · 🇺🇸 | $7.60 | 2.67× | 122.9% | -2,184 BTC | -10,375 | -789 | 9,542 | $970 M | — | -24,301 / -66,077 |
Claims = Debt + Preferred stock liquidation preference − Cash on hand (cash can pay those claims down before the BTC is ever touched, so it nets against them — matches cebetracker.io's own published formula). CEBE (BTC) = (BTC held × BTC price − Claims) ÷ BTC price — what's actually left for a COMMON shareholder once debt and preferred stock are paid. Sats/$100 is the number to actually compare across tickers: sats of real common-equity BTC exposure per $100 spent on the STOCK, after every senior claim is netted out.
This is a liquidation-waterfall stress test, not a going-concern figure — it assumes every claim is paid TODAY. In practice a company services its preferred dividends and debt coupons as a going concern and the BTC just compounds; low CEBE coverage is a solvency-stress signal, not evidence the stock is mispriced right now. Debt, preferred, and cash figures are curated approximations refreshed periodically from filings. 1 company from the same curated list were checked and left off this run because yfinance could not price it, or the most recent quote was too old to trust — a company disappearing from here is a data gap, not a claim it stopped holding Bitcoin. Nothing here is investment advice.
Everything above this point is a liquidation snapshot — what would be left if every claim were paid off TODAY. That's the wrong lens for a question that actually matters day to day: can the company keep paying its preferred dividend out of its own business, or is it funding that dividend some other way? Annual dividend obligation = preferred liquidation preference × blended dividend rate. Coverage = operating cash flow (core business, trailing twelve months) ÷ that obligation. Above 1× means operations cover the bill; below 1× — and especially negative, like MSTR today — means the dividend is being funded some other way entirely: a capital raise, asset sales, a dedicated cash reserve, not the business itself.
A blank here means one of two different things, kept separate on purpose: a dash (—) means the company has no preferred stock at all, so there's nothing to cover. "n/a" means real preferred stock exists but the company's own disclosures don't isolate core-business cash flow cleanly enough to compute this honestly (Metaplanet today, whose consolidated cash flow is swamped by its Bitcoin Income Business) — that's a data gap, not a zero, and we'd rather show the gap than force a number into it.
Shows what Sats/$100 would read if BTC fell 20% or 50% from today, holding the stock price and every claim (debt, preferred, cash) exactly where they are. It deliberately does NOT also drop the stock price in proportion — if it did, a company whose whole balance sheet is BTC would show an artificially stable ratio (both sides of the fraction shrinking together), which would hide the exact risk this exists to expose: fixed-dollar claims eating a growing share of a shrinking BTC pile. This is why a heavily preferred- or debt-funded name's stress numbers fall off faster than a debt-free one's — the claims don't shrink when BTC does, so they consume a bigger bite of a smaller pie. A negative −50% reading is a real signal: common's claimed BTC backing would be gone at that price, even though the company still legally owns every coin. Not a prediction of what BTC will do, and not a claim the stock price would actually hold still — a pure "how much of the cushion is claims-related" isolation test.
← All Bitcoin Treasuries categories