Plain "BTC per share" counts every coin a company holds as if it all belonged to you. It doesn't — debt and preferred stock sit ahead of common stock in line. CEBE answers the sharper question: what's actually left once they're paid? Click any column to sort.
Updated 2026-10-10 23:24 UTC · BTC $82,966 ·25 companies priced
| # | Company | Price | mNAV | Claims % | CEBE (BTC) | Sats/$100 ▼ | CEBE sats/sh | BTC held | Claims $ | Pref coverage | BTC stress (−20%/−50%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $0.20 | 0.05× ◆ | 10.1% | 2,605 BTC | 2,179,676 | 4,447 | 2,899 | $24 M | — | 2,118,229 / 1,933,889 | |
| 2 | HOGPF H100 Group · H100.ST · 🇸🇪 | $0.20 | 0.23× ◆ | 7.9% | 3,229 BTC | 477,124 | 954 | 3,506 | $23 M | — | 466,884 / 436,164 |
| 3 | $1.65 | 0.59× ◆ | 4.2% | 41,178 BTC | 194,970 | 3,217 | 43,000 | $151 M | n/a | 192,812 / 186,341 | |
| 4 | ZOOZ ZOOZ Strategy · 🇺🇸 | $6.99 | 0.65× ◆ | 0.0% | 1,046 BTC | 184,718 | 12,912 | 1,046 | $0 M | — | 184,718 / 184,718 |
| 5 | XXI Twenty One Capital · 🇺🇸 | $6.29 | 0.60× ◆ | 13.5% | 37,650 BTC | 172,594 | 10,856 | 43,514 | $486 M | — | 165,873 / 145,713 |
| 6 | KULR KULR Technology · 🇺🇸 | $2.46 | 1.27× | 0.0% | 1,083 BTC | 95,128 | 2,340 | 1,083 | $0 M | — | 95,128 / 95,128 |
| 7 | $154.34 | 0.85× ◆ | 33.7% | 559,849 BTC | 93,341 | 144,062 | 845,050 | $23.7 B | -0.012× | 81,453 / 45,790 | |
| 8 | $0.30 | 1.34× | 0.0% | 1,862 BTC | 89,874 | 270 | 1,862 | $0 M | — | 89,874 / 89,874 | |
| 9 | TSWCF The Smarter Web Company · SWC.L · 🇬🇧 | $0.84 | 1.37× | 0.0% | 2,747 BTC | 87,917 | 739 | 2,747 | $0 M | — | 87,917 / 87,917 |
| 10 | FUFU BitFuFu · 🇸🇬 | $1.38 | 1.47× | 0.0% | 1,855 BTC | 81,763 | 1,124 | 1,855 | $0 M | — | 81,763 / 81,763 |
| 11 | $27.80 | 1.30× | 49.1% | 12,483 BTC | 47,300 | 13,149 | 24,531 | $1,000 M | n/a | 35,888 / 1,651 | |
| 12 | $32.59 | 2.60× | 0.0% | 24,400 BTC | 46,443 | 15,136 | 24,400 | $0 M | — | 46,443 / 46,443 | |
| 13 | $10.49 | 2.72× | 58.2% | 5,635 BTC | 18,516 | 1,943 | 13,470 | $650 M | — | 12,081 / -7,225 | |
| 14 | $9.65 | 1.12× | 83.0% | 6,170 BTC | 18,269 | 1,763 | 36,303 | $2.5 B | — | -4,035 / -70,948 | |
| 15 | CPTLF Capital B (fmr. The Blockchain Group) · ALCPB.PA · 🇫🇷 | $6.11 | 7.03× | 0.0% | 3,145 BTC | 17,135 | 1,046 | 3,145 | $0 M | — | 17,135 / 17,135 |
| 16 | $16.89 | 4.67× | 46.1% | 8,448 BTC | 13,898 | 2,347 | 15,680 | $600 M | — | 10,924 / 2,001 | |
| 17 | ABTC American Bitcoin · 🇺🇸 | $7.73 | 13.57× | 0.0% | 7,300 BTC | 8,884 | 687 | 7,300 | $0 M | — | 8,884 / 8,884 |
| 18 | CANG Cango Inc · 🇨🇳 | $3.51 | 7.79× | 44.4% | 592 BTC | 8,602 | 302 | 1,065 | $39 M | — | 6,882 / 1,724 |
| 19 | $84.27 | 10.87× | 35.2% | 6,662 BTC | 7,187 | 6,056 | 10,278 | $300 M | — | 6,212 / 3,286 | |
| 20 | VIDA Vida Global Inc. · 🇺🇸 | $1.47 | 21.63× | 0.0% | 12 BTC | 5,573 | 82 | 11.69 | $0 M | — | 5,573 / 5,573 |
| 21 | $179.39 | 36.93× | 0.0% | 15,389 BTC | 3,264 | 5,855 | 15,389 | $0 M | — | 3,264 / 3,264 | |
| 22 | CIFR Cipher Digital (fmr. Cipher Mining) · 🇺🇸 | $13.52 | 44.43× | 0.0% | 1,500 BTC | 2,713 | 367 | 1,500 | $0 M | — | 2,713 / 2,713 |
| 23 | $77.24 | 61.35× | 0.0% | 9,032 BTC | 1,965 | 1,518 | 9,032 | $0 M | — | 1,965 / 1,965 | |
| 24 | $382.70 | 1286.55× | 0.0% | 11,509 BTC | 94 | 359 | 11,509 | $0 M | — | 94 / 94 | |
| 25 | DJT Trump Media & Technology · 🇺🇸 | $8.11 | 2.84× | 122.5% | -2,150 BTC | -9,568 | -776 | 9,542 | $970 M | — | -22,579 / -61,612 |
Claims = Debt + Preferred stock liquidation preference − Cash on hand (cash can pay those claims down before the BTC is ever touched, so it nets against them — matches cebetracker.io's own published formula). CEBE (BTC) = (BTC held × BTC price − Claims) ÷ BTC price — what's actually left for a COMMON shareholder once debt and preferred stock are paid. Sats/$100 is the number to actually compare across tickers: sats of real common-equity BTC exposure per $100 spent on the STOCK, after every senior claim is netted out.
This is a liquidation-waterfall stress test, not a going-concern figure — it assumes every claim is paid TODAY. In practice a company services its preferred dividends and debt coupons as a going concern and the BTC just compounds; low CEBE coverage is a solvency-stress signal, not evidence the stock is mispriced right now. Debt, preferred, and cash figures are curated approximations refreshed periodically from filings. 1 company from the same curated list were checked and left off this run because yfinance could not price it, or the most recent quote was too old to trust — a company disappearing from here is a data gap, not a claim it stopped holding Bitcoin. Nothing here is investment advice.
Everything above this point is a liquidation snapshot — what would be left if every claim were paid off TODAY. That's the wrong lens for a question that actually matters day to day: can the company keep paying its preferred dividend out of its own business, or is it funding that dividend some other way? Annual dividend obligation = preferred liquidation preference × blended dividend rate. Coverage = operating cash flow (core business, trailing twelve months) ÷ that obligation. Above 1× means operations cover the bill; below 1× — and especially negative, like MSTR today — means the dividend is being funded some other way entirely: a capital raise, asset sales, a dedicated cash reserve, not the business itself.
A blank here means one of two different things, kept separate on purpose: a dash (—) means the company has no preferred stock at all, so there's nothing to cover. "n/a" means real preferred stock exists but the company's own disclosures don't isolate core-business cash flow cleanly enough to compute this honestly (Metaplanet today, whose consolidated cash flow is swamped by its Bitcoin Income Business) — that's a data gap, not a zero, and we'd rather show the gap than force a number into it.
Shows what Sats/$100 would read if BTC fell 20% or 50% from today, holding the stock price and every claim (debt, preferred, cash) exactly where they are. It deliberately does NOT also drop the stock price in proportion — if it did, a company whose whole balance sheet is BTC would show an artificially stable ratio (both sides of the fraction shrinking together), which would hide the exact risk this exists to expose: fixed-dollar claims eating a growing share of a shrinking BTC pile. This is why a heavily preferred- or debt-funded name's stress numbers fall off faster than a debt-free one's — the claims don't shrink when BTC does, so they consume a bigger bite of a smaller pie. A negative −50% reading is a real signal: common's claimed BTC backing would be gone at that price, even though the company still legally owns every coin. Not a prediction of what BTC will do, and not a claim the stock price would actually hold still — a pure "how much of the cushion is claims-related" isolation test.
← All Bitcoin Treasuries categories